In individual relationships, it’s easy to complain.
The problem with complaining as a primary way of relating is that, often, there aren’t positive changes.
In fact, when you complain about somebody else, the most common reaction you’ll get is a counter-complaint.
This can spark a “complaint war.”
Here’s why complaints don’t always work and sometimes backfire and make the situation worse.
Complaining creates a power differential between two people.
There is the judger (a.k.a. the complainer) and the person being judged (a.k.a. the recipient of the complaint).
While some relationships have a built-in hierarchy (manager vs. direct report, parent vs. child), many other relationships are more peer-level (e.g., coworker vs. coworker, friend vs. friend, spouse vs. spouse, sibling vs. sibling).
Especially in relationships amongst equals, complaining creates a (temporary) power hierarchy. For the person on the receiving end of the complaint, it can feel offensive because they did not agree to be placed in the hierarchy.
Your brother or sister did not agree that you would be superior to them. Your coworker did not consent to you being their boss. Your spouse did not consent to be in a subservient role to you (unless they explicitly did agree to that).
As a result, when something is bothering you in a peer-level relationship, and you complain about it, you now have two problems. You have the original issue that was bothering you. You also have the issue of the recipient of the complaint reacting with defensiveness, resentment, or issuing a counter-complaint about you.
After all, the fastest way to stop feeling judged when someone complains about you is to judge and complain about them in return. While this is fast, it creates a self-reinforcing and often endless complaint cycle.
So, what can you do instead of complaining?
If you’re upset about a particular situation, instead of complaining, try making a request.
A request sounds like this:
“I have a request I’d like to ask of you. Would you (be willing to) ________________?”
For example, let’s say you’re upset because a colleague left you off of a meeting invite for a project. Instead of complaining by saying, “Why didn’t you include me in the meeting!” (which you’ll notice was not phrased as a question), try saying “I have a request I’d like to ask of you. Would you (be willing to) add me to the meeting invite for the weekly Project XYZ meeting?”
In professional settings, I prefer this request phrase: “Would you _______?”
(e.g., Would you add me to the meeting invite for this Friday?)
In familial and romantic relationships, I prefer this request phrase: “Would you be willing to ____________?”
I prefer explicitly adding the phrase “be willing to” because it is a good reminder of the difference between a request and a demand.
A demand is when there is only one correct response.
“Take out the trash” is not a request. It is a demand.
You can tell by the grammar, as “Take out the trash” is phrased as a statement and lacks a question mark.
When you start a request with “Would you be willing to” it sounds more explicitly like a question. “Would you be willing to have a one-on-one check-in meeting with me every other Friday afternoon?”
Phrasing it as a question gives the other person the option to say yes or no. In peer relationships, you ask. In hierarchical relationships, it’s better to ask, but you can sometimes make demands and get away with it.
I can demand that my kids clean up the mess they made. For a romantic partner, it will go over a lot better (especially in the long run) if I ask.
When you make a request, it also creates an opportunity for the other person to express their needs and negotiate.
So when you say, “Would you be willing to have a one-on-one check-in meeting with me every other Friday afternoon?” the other person can say no and make a counteroffer.
“I’m sorry. I have a conflict on Friday afternoon. Instead of a meeting, I’d be happy to have a check-in phone call every other Friday morning. Would that work for you?”
(Perhaps the person you asked is super busy. Perhaps they have an extra-long commute to a secondary office location on Friday mornings. Perhaps a phone call while commuting is easier for them.)
This will go much better than demanding a peer meet with you one-on-one every Friday afternoon, like this: “I demand you meet with me every other Friday afternoon for a check-in meeting.”
So, the takeaway from all of this is very simple.
Complain less.
Make requests more.
What do you think about this strategy? Comment below to let me know.
How to Live an Amazing Life – Sign Up for Free Tips and Strategies for your Career and Life.
This form collects your name and email so that we can add you to our email list that delivers the free resources you are requesting. Check out our privacy policy for details on how we protect and manage your submitted data.
We’ll never spam you or share your email. Unsubscribe at any time.
6 thoughts on “Complaints vs. Requests”
Julia – I’m a fan of NVC but requests comes from multiple sources and not just Rosenberg. You see it a lot in couples counseling and in parent/child relationship contexts.
I agree that sometimes people do not do what you request. I try (emphasis on try) to perceive this as them taking care of their own needs. For me personally, I either find another way to get my need met, “mourn” that my need won’t be met in this case, or decide whether the relationship is one that on balance I want to continue to be in or invest in. The more accepting and respectful of other people’s choices and decisions the more I realize that I am not compatible with some people… and that is okay.
Personally, I would be respectful in a non-relationship with someone else than be in a relationship where very few of my needs get more or I have to force the other person to meet my needs.
I didn’t fully understand your example and don’t want to guess on your intended meaning. From what I am guessing, you’re talking about a situation where you asked somebody to do something, they did not, it was very important to you, and so you demanded / forced them to do what you wanted. My sense is this solves one problem (the thing you ended up demanding) but creates another (the use of “violence” in Rosenberg terms) to get what you needed accomplished.
If I understood the details correctly, my inclination is to wonder if this real or hypothetical relationship you describe is a mutually compatible and mutually beneficial one. If it is not, perhaps a less involves, less close, less reliant relationship (or no relationship) should be considered.
Also if one’s suicidal thoughts depend on the actions or lack of actions by another person, I think that’s a serious issue that goes deeper and beyond requests versus demands. I have a two hour video and resource page on the topic of suicide that can be found here:
https://caseinterview.com/suicide
This is actually pretty insightful. The reasons that you listed for a person not to respond to our request are pretty on point. Thanks for sharing!
K – You’re welcome
Your article is not new information to me. In fact, this is called non-violent communication. I have always preferred asking instead of demanding as a strategy, since I i) value other people and them having their own opinions and ii) am strong enough to accept a no or a compromise in general.
The ‘ask instead of demand’ – strategy is, however, falling short sometimes. It falls short if the following two conditions are met:
a) asking did not lead to any successful result e.g.
– because the other person simply does not listen – and some people do not listen for months or years!!
– or because the other person refuses to talk to you in general
– or because the other person agreed they would do something but don’t keep their word
– or because the other person has no intent to find a mutually acceptable solution
– or because the other person does not want to talk to you as an equal and tries to impose something onto you by demanding themselves
– or the other person simply keeps lying to you instead of telling the truth, …
AND
b) the matter is so serious that you cannot accept a non-successful outcome for some very good and serious reasons.
This is why I prefer the following strategy:
I always ask first, but do not shy away from demanding as SECOND step if UNAVOIDABLE. I am willing to bear the consequences demanding might bring with it, as I know game theory (tit-for-tat strategy) and have already taken the likely consequences into account when deciding wether demanding would be unavoidable or not.
A good example might be if e.g. you are forced to demand and for this even accept threats to your life as consequences of demanding if your life is so unbearable that you have suicidal thoughts anyhow and asking did not lead to a successful resolution of the situation in the past.
What do you think about this strategy?
Great thoughts. Perfect example of strong EQ. Wish Leadership also follows the same giving a team a sense of equality and respect.
Many Thanks for sharing these ideas
Ravi – It sounds like your leadership team doesn’t do this. Perhaps you can make it a goal that you do so when you’re in a leadership position.