I’ve written extensively about my time working in McKinsey’s New York office. However, today I will share with you something I learned outside of work while walking the streets of Manhattan.
I grew up in San Diego, CA. It’s a warm city where temperatures range from 15 to 23 degrees C (60 to 75 degrees F) during the day, year-round.
When I first moved to New York, I experienced my first winter. For the first time, my body was chilled to the bone.
I remember one winter the temperatures had dropped to -7 C (20 degrees F). I’d never been so cold in my life. I pulled out all the warm clothes I had — long underwear, big warm coat, scarf, hat — and I was STILL cold.
Normally, I try to wear a somewhat fashionable winter hat (if that’s even possible), but it was so cold I bought one of those super fluffy hats that generously covers your ears, heavily insulated and padded. They’re terribly unfashionable (even for me!), but wow are they warm. So, at -7 C (20 degrees F), I gave in.
I didn’t care that my head looked like a well-insulated elephant. I wanted to be warm (or at least less cold).
I remember walking down the streets of Manhattan and seeing these couples walk down the street for a night on the town. That didn’t seem that unusual to me.
What really shocked me was how some of these women were wearing miniskirts without a full-length wool coat or fur coat of any kind. The women looked really good — Manhattan Chic — but they were shivering too.
That was the year I came up with the concept that I call “vanity temperature.” Your vanity temperature is the temperature threshold where you stop caring what you look like and what others think, and you focus purely on what you need to wear to stay warm.
So, -7 C (20 degrees F) had long since surpassed my vanity temperature. For the high-fashion women of Manhattan, that wasn’t cold enough to cross their vanity temperature thresholds.
Which approach is right?
That decision is always a personal choice. However, what I want to point out is that there’s always a price to be paid for looking good — especially if you’re trying to look good to impress others or maintain a certain social standing.
Regardless of the reason, there’s ALWAYS a price to be paid.
The question is: At what point is it no longer worth it?
At what metaphorical “vanity temperature” do you stop caring what others think, and do what you need to do to take care of yourself?
(I’m not talking about the weather anymore. I’m talking about work, career, money, prestige, relationships, family, marriages, children.)
Some people have no limits.
They will do anything needed to be “successful” or to maintain a certain social standing — run their health into the ground, ruin every relationship they have, and damage their lives in many ways (often in a way that’s not obviously visible to others).
Where are your limits?
How much is too much?
Those are personal questions and choices. However, I will say this:
If you have no limits… If you will do anything, say anything, sacrifice anything to be “successful,” then what kind of life will you have left when you’re finally “successful”?
Share your thoughts with me below.
How to Live an Amazing Life – Sign Up for Free Tips and Strategies for your Career and Life.
This form collects your name and email so that we can add you to our email list that delivers the free resources you are requesting. Check out our privacy policy for details on how we protect and manage your submitted data.
We’ll never spam you or share your email. Unsubscribe at any time.
47 thoughts on “The Downside of Looking Good”
Thanks for sharing, Victor. The question at the end of the article seems to raise a rational thinking, I think it will be very interesting if we do use consulting method to analysis this problem.
Our ultimate goal should be maximum our welfare, and let’s assume that only comes from two factors – Good look (Career success) and Health (Others, like family, friendship…), the equation would be:
Personal Welfare
= Welfare from good look Welfare from health
= level of good look * Utility per unit of good look level of health * Utility per unit of health
Level of good look and health could be measured relatively reliably, however, utility is a subjective stuff. It is based on personal belief, resulting from one’s experience, education, living environment… and affected by the law of diminishing returns. Thus, different personal utility would make people chose different level of good look (success) and health (others) to maximum their personal welfare. Both heavily emphasis on good look and health could be rational. With the change of personal context and their belief, the utility per unit of the two factors would change (also affected by law of diminishing returns), and people may need a new “optimal solution”. That’s part of the reason why many people may regret when they “grow up”.
So, my understanding is that there is no “right” way or “optimal balance” in life, it’s all depends on your beliefs. “Having no limits” in a certain period of time because of specific utility parameters is OK. (Surely it’s hard to believe some people will keep that utility pattern for their whole life.)
In fact, I believe personal belief dominates a lot of stuffs in our lives, from ethical issue to business decision making. So, there are almost no truth, but just beliefs. I got that thinking in my bachelor degree, when I studied Politics.
Sometimes, we were asked to analysis different governances in different countries. Many democratic states have similar structure, but they are quite different in detail policy. America enjoys freedom, encouraging free market and the pursuit of wealth; some European countries, however, prefer “Welfare State”, sharing wealth with all people in the country, which, to some extent, is not good for wealth growing. (People who work hard may just earn as much as people who do nothing.) When you compare the two, could you tell which one is better? Or, the first question should be answered, why there is such a difference? The difference, I believe, should come from the different beliefs of the people in these countries. Some European people believe that a real developed state should be a place that everyone on the land would receive a good education, healthcare and working opportunity, that’s why they vote for a “Welfare State”. America, as the “New World”, is a place to purse wealth, fame and success, people are not really come here to share their welfare with others. Those different beliefs result in different governance and both are perfect. (Surely, the real situation is more complex and things change. No one continuously follows a certain pattern, because the context and people’s belief would change. But that difference does exist and is observable.) The states have different choices, so do us. There is no best governance, neither a best way of life.
What I hope is, all of us could really understand ourselves (some say this is the hardest part), find our personal “optimal solution” and keep working hard to follow that. No need to hesitate, even if there will be a change ahead. You never know what will happen before you really be there.
Hi Victor
I really enjoy reading your articles and view you as a mentor. My own limits especially when it comes to achieving success in my career center on the time I get to spend with my loved ones. I once read this guy’s recount about how one of his close family members passed away while he was slugging away at his office inside an investment bank at 11pm. It’s a scenario I want to avoid.
Fully agree. As I understand, it depends partly on the age and maturity: in the beginning of career you are full of aspirations and great goals. But after certain time you may start realizing there are other valuablr things in your life. And by this time you may possess enough experience to switch your activity to more comfortable pace and work life balance and devote yourself to other things (like family, or hobby).
What does it mean to be successful? I think we can be wrong even if we think we know it. I have started thinking about this recently, after reaching much success without happiness.
Perhaps, people should firstly deeply analyze themselves to better understand what success means to them. Without doing such analysis we might be easily side-tracked. It is like solving a case without structure.
It happened to me. After being one of the best students and receiving stipendia and got back from internship, I was not happy. Now, I am focusing on who I am rather that to be successful.
I’m really glad that I got the opportunity to read this while young. Thanks, Victor.
Victor,I’ve always enjoyed reading your articles;They’re power
packed and I’ve saved each one of them.As a Management Teacher,I share your thoughts with my students and they love
them.
Keep up the good work.
Cheers,Vinesh
I follow your posts with much interest ! They are insightful as they are thought provoking. The question on “Vanity Temperature” is an interesting one – one that most of us grapple with, both in professional and personal lives. In my opinion, deciding the important things to focus on in each situation without compromising values can help decide what to keep, what to forgo. Sure it will be a struggle doing this and it is never going to be easy. Negotiating the way to reach this fine balance is the art of a life well lived.
Never really looked at it this way before, especially the looking good part. But so true. Totally believe it.
Hi Victor,
Its a question for everyone what are your vanity limits… I guess it all derives from the situation you have come through. If you had hard times in your early life and having money was always a challenge then probably having money at any cost would become the ultimate goal. If you have seen somebody having a great happiness because of the success then that becomes probably your ultimate goal and you could go at any stretch for achieving it… so basically its the situation that creates a mindset/ goal and that probably derives the vanity point for a person.
The philosophical / spiritual world has already answered this question that the ultimate point to reach is God and no matter how much you fight for the materialistic achievements it won’t last longer. Let me know your views on this.
Hi Victor,
Firstly Happy New Year. I am a regular reader of your emails and I find them really insightful.
You are right there should be limits to my wishes or else we have to pay dearly.
Maintaining the balance is what is difficult , at times.