I recently received a kind note from an F1Y who got a job offer from one of the top firms. She was excited and thanked me for helping her to achieve “perfection” in her case preparation.
I was thrilled for her and appreciate the gratitude in the spirit it was given.
In thinking about the conversation, I realized that her use of the word “perfection” didn’t sit well with me for some reason. After thinking about it for a few days, I realized why.
I prefer the concept of striving for “excellence” instead of aiming to achieve “perfection.”
Excellence is about setting a high standard for yourself and focusing on getting as good as you can possibly be. It is ultimately inward-focused.
It’s about being as excellent as YOU can be.
It’s your current ability vs. YOUR maximum potential.
The concept of perfection (at least the way I think about it) feels much more like an external standard. We are aiming to be “perfect” based on someone else’s standard. It is you vs. an impossible-to-achieve standard.
This may seem like semantics — arguing over subtle differences in words.
BUT like I’ve said on previous occasions, your words reveal your thinking, and your thinking dictates your actions. (Your thinking also determines how you feel emotionally about your actions.)
Let me give you an example.
Assume that you’re an athlete at the Olympics.
If you strive for “excellence,” break your own personal record by a HUGE amount and win a silver medal, you’re thrilled about your accomplishment.
Alternatively, let’s say you’re a “perfection”-oriented person. At the Olympics, you also break your personal record and when the competition ends, you discover you “lost gold” (a.k.a., won silver). Under these circumstances, you will feel terrible about failing to be perfect.
Key Insight (worth writing down):
The problem with striving for perfection is no matter how much you accomplish, you will (I hypothesize) NEVER be happy.
I saw a lot of this addiction to perfection at McKinsey. I also saw it a lot when I spent a decade in Silicon Valley.
In Silicon Valley, for example, you see this perfectionism play out as follows:
If you sell a company for $100 million, how do you know you didn’t just get lucky?
If you sell two companies for $100 million each, you still didn’t sell either for $1 billion.
If you are “only” a $1 billionaire, you’re not as “perfect” as being a MULTI-billionaire.
If you have a Harvard undergrad degree, you still don’t have a Harvard Law degree.
Striving for perfection is an incredibly slippery slope because no accomplishment is ever enough.
As a guy with three daughters, I’ve started paying attention to perfectionism in women.
The entire American culture of being a woman (from my perspective) is heavily perfection-based. You see it in women’s magazines.
Buy this product to look more beautiful/less blemished/attract a guy. In short, every product assumes you’re flawed, and every product promises to get you closer to perfection.
I used to be an occasional reader of Cosmo Girl magazine — before the magazine went out of business. When I told this to moms in my community, they were always puzzled and had a look of concern on their faces…. basically, as if I was some kind of freak.
But, once I explained why I read it, they just laughed.
So, why did I used to read Cosmo Girl magazine?
ANSWER:
To know thy enemy.
Whatever brainwashing society was going to inflict on my girls, I wanted to know it well so I could attempt to inoculate my girls from it.
So, what problem did I have with Cosmo Girl magazine (and by extension, Cosmo magazine for adult women)?
It’s the premise.
The premise = You are (very) flawed and that’s a problem.
I found the entire thing disgusting.
Literally, every page — every ad, every article — was laced with this presupposition. It’s one thing to put this in front of adult women who can make their own choices, it’s another thing entirely to put it in front of an impressionable 11-year-old girl.
Got pimples? We can fix that.
Don’t know how to do your hair the right way? We can fix that too.
How to get boys to pay attention to you? We can fix that too.
Unless you know what the publisher or advertiser is doing, and why they are doing it, you will (after say 10 years of reading this stuff in one’s formative years) assume you’re hopelessly flawed.
What I try to teach my kids:
Yes, you are flawed (because EVERYBODY is flawed… NOBODY is perfect) and you’re perfectly fine the way you are.
Yes, strive for excellence to see how good you can become at whatever you’re striving for, but NEVER feel bad for not being perfect.
What’s ironic is the more successful someone is, the more it seems they’re likely to suffer from addiction to perfection.
When I was at Stanford, a survey of Stanford women showed that roughly 85% of Stanford women were unhappy with their bodies.
Here were some of the most accomplished women in the world — future supreme court justices, Nobel prize winners, contributors to society, and the amount of genuine concern (and energy) about not having a perfect body really surprised me.
At McKinsey, the open secret is a lot of McKinsey people are incredibly talented AND incredibly insecure (in their lack of perfection). Many even argue that McKinsey targets the over-achieving, highly insecure — because they “need” the validation McKinsey provides.
This obviously isn’t completely true, but neither is it completely false either.
Arguably, the people with the greatest accomplishments are the MOST insecure — in part because they are close enough to perfection to see it, but never close enough to reach it.
I am not immune.
When I left McKinsey to do my first (of many) startups, my first one failed (the second one too). I kept benchmarking my career success vs. my former peers.
Geez — so and so sold his company for $300 million. I did not (and still haven’t). Then, my wife’s former college roommate sold her company for $950 million. Geez, I’m nowhere close.
In my early days as an entrepreneur, I struggled quite a lot.
I built and maintained a financial model comparing my current earnings vs. what I’d be earning if I were still at McKinsey vs. what I would be earning if I were working at McDonald’s.
(Sadly, McDonald’s won in more months than I care to admit.)
Yes, this is what ex-McKinsey people do with their spare time and insecurities… we QUANTIFY how much of a loser we feel like. Some habits, even when wallowing in self-pity, are hard to break!
Needless to say, those estimation skills came in handy… 🙂
Is striving for perfection really that bad?
YES, it is.
Let me explain why.
Perfectionism is an addiction. A perfectionist needs the “high” of achievement in order to feel good about himself.
Although addiction to achievement doesn’t seem like that big of a deal, the problem comes when the perfectionist is willing to put achievement over and above everything else in life — marriage, children, health (and for some, even the law).
The thought process of the perfectionist is to sacrifice (potentially everything) to achieve what’s “missing,” and once that has been achieved, to appreciate life at that point in time.
This is a fool’s journey.
The accomplishment addict will never stop and will never be satisfied for more than a few brief moments.
If you think management consultants, who are hyper-analytical, are immune from this, you are wrong.
Just ask Rajat Gupta — the former head of McKinsey worldwide… who is now in prison for insider trading.
Why would someone who is on the board of Goldman Sachs and P&G, who is a personal advisor to Bill Gates AND Bill Clinton engage in insider trading?
The speculation is Rajat Gupta, who has an estimated net worth of $125M, was frustrated that he wasn’t a billionaire.
Many of his (Wall Street) friends were billionaires and he thought he was just as smart (if not more so) than them… and wondered how come I’m not a billionaire yet?
Like I said earlier… any addiction, even to perfection, when taken to an extreme can be dangerous.
My key message in sharing all this is to make the following two points:
1) Success is getting what you strive for.
2) Happiness is appreciating what you got.
Never CONFUSE the two. They are INDEPENDENT.
Do you want to be successful? To be happy? or to be Both?
These are entirely distinct (but not mutually exclusive) paths.
Statistically speaking, in the United States once a person’s income reaches the country-wide median income (around $50,000 USD for Americans), their level of happiness does not increase as income increases.
Translated, once you know you will not starve to death and die, more money does not equal more happiness.
Once again, the two are SEPARATE.
Success is achieved externally. Happiness is achieved internally (through introspection).
I mention this because I wish someone had explained this to me very early in life.
While I understood this idea intellectually, I never experienced it personally until very recently.
You see over the past year or so, I’ve been working through my emotional baggage and issues with a therapist. Yes, I am terribly flawed.
Until recently, I always saw this as a problem… something never to be admitted to and in my heart of hearts to be ashamed of.
And after a year of working through the therapeutic process, I’m for the first time in my life actually okay with my flaws and “failures.”
There was a time in my life (most of it actually) where the thought of my even “admitting” that I had problems and was seeing a therapist was horrifying.
I would have feelings of shame and fear that I would lose the respect of others.
(And yes, I really hope my parents never read this article… obviously, I’m not 100% “cured” yet!)
I’ve decided to share this part of my life for two reasons.
1) It is what it is. I am what I am… and I am finally accepting this to be true and even appreciating it.
2) I wanted to share my experience with you and my other readers in the event anything I’ve said resonates with you.
I wish I’d had an emotionally healthy role model to learn from early in life. I never did. Although I’m not sure I’m 100% emotionally healthy, I am certain I’m emotionally healthier than before.
Through this introspective process, I’ve come to recognize a theme in my professional work.
I like helping the “underdog,” and I like “leveling the playing field” for the audiences I serve — small business owners and more recently, aspiring and new management consultants.
For many years, I was reluctant to admit to either for fear of embarrassment.
Four years ago, I was giving a keynote speech at a conference hosted by Fortune magazine. The Chief Marketing Officer for Dell wasn’t able to give the keynote, and they asked me to step in as the keynote speaker.
The conference was geared towards mid-size companies — companies that are a lot more lucrative to serve as consulting clients (than small businesses) because they can afford higher fees.
I was explaining the work I do and more importantly the size (or lack thereof) of the clients I serve to another speaker. His response has stuck with me all these years.
“Victor, I get it. You have this stellar Fortune 500 background and you are willing to help the little guy and you aren’t even the slightest bit embarrassed by it. That’s so interesting,” (in reference to the lack of my embarrassment… which of course implied I SHOULD be embarrassed by it).
I was too surprised by the remark to be offended — but that’s what I was… offended.
Along similar lines, about two years ago, I was reading a message board post about me written by an anonymous user… you know how snarky and mean anonymous posters can get. I’ll never forget one criticism of me.
“If that Victor Cheng guy is so good, why in the hell would he be helping all of us get jobs. If he were really THAT good, he’d be CEO somewhere by now. He’s a loser.” (I edited out the 4-letter words that were used to describe me.)
Ouch!
I suppose at some level, it’s true. If I really were “good enough” to be a Fortune 500 CEO, I probably would not be writing this right now. But, you know, I’m okay with it.
You see, the real reason I work with “underdogs” is because I get great personal satisfaction from doing so.
Of all the emails I get, my favorite one was from a young undergrad from Brown University (I think it was Brown). She had just gotten double offers from McKinsey and BCG.
She was raised by a single mother who earns $25,000 USD (very close to the U.S. poverty line) — a mother who sacrificed enormously to be able to get her to Brown. The F1Y herself had worked hard and sacrificed for years to help create a better life for herself and for her mother.
As she explained, it was a HUGE deal for her (and her family) when she got two consulting job offers as a 21-year-old soon to be college graduate. Her first-year compensation?
$90,000 USD — nearly 4 TIMES what her mother earns in a year.
I was THRILLED for her.
I remember her closing lines were something like, “For years I wondered if all the work and hardship would ever pay off, thanks to your help, it did pay off. Thank you so much.”
It was one of the most meaningful emails I received in my life. Up until that time, I thought I was just helping people out with a tough job interview.
After I received that email, I realized that I had just helped to change someone’s life for the better. I never thought of it that way before. I’ve also never stopped thinking about it that way since that email.
THAT is why I do what I do.
In fact, not only am I not embarrassed by what I do and whom I do it for, I’m PROUD of helping others. It is the most psychologically rewarding work I’ve ever done in my life. And selfishly, it makes me happy.
So maybe if I were “better,” I would be a CEO by now.
Maybe if I wanted more money, I’d serve the big clients who have a lot of it.
Maybe if I did those things, I’d be more “successful” (by someone else’s definition).
But all of that just isn’t me. I realize and appreciate this about myself… enough to speak openly about it.
I love what I do and who I do it for.
By traditional standards, I’m probably the farthest I’ve ever been from being perfect and “successful” (I am not a gazillionaire, a CEO of a public company, nor do I manage 500 employees), but I do strive for excellence in my work every day, I’m successful by my own standard, and I’ve never been happier.
Success vs. Happiness…. and Excellence vs. Perfection
Give it some thought as it applies to your life.
This form collects your name and email so that we can add you to our email list that delivers the free resources you are requesting. Check out our privacy policy for details on how we protect and manage your submitted data.
We’ll never spam you or share your email. Unsubscribe at any time.
131 thoughts on “Striving for Excellence vs. Perfection”
Thanks for helping the “little guys”. I am one of the little guy. I didn’t go to target school. My family are no where near to the de facto prestigious pedigree. I faced challenges and obstacles. I am deaf therefore it give me a un-leveled playing ground. I am stereotyped to someone who will have 4th grade level reading and unfit to living a productive life.
I have overcame the obstacles. And, I have more to slay the “dragons”.
I am blessed you wrote a book on case interview. It really help me on becoming better analyst. As matter of fact, I focus on improving my mathematical skills, refining decision making, and practicing my Minto Pyramid Principle.
I am exciting to see you releasing a product for those who didn’t go to target school. It maybe will increase my confident to repackage myself as someone who is capable and competitive.
I am clearly disabled but always -able in achieve greatness. Granted, it is take more layers to peel to get where I need to be.
Whether of becoming a consultant or not and I know I will become a better acumen due to your sharing the roadmap to the consulting life. I thank you for share what you gain from your years at McKinsey and the continuing new experiences as Victor Cheng, INC.
Excellence instead of perfection … it is so easy and yet it first had to be pointed out for me to see it. Striving for perfection is fatiguing and frustrating, striving for perfection and (of course) failing in it is what drives people mad and makes them unhappy. Striving for excellence it is then, and happiness. Thanks for sharing!
Wow,
a very nice article with an important lesson that I wish I had at the very beginning of my life. Though better late than never.
Teşekkürler – “Thanks” in Turkish
Altan
Hi Victor have you heard of the Landmark Forum? It’s a transformational program. I believe you would find great value in it.
Hello Victor,
Thank you for the great piece of advice!
I have been thinking about such issues lately myself. I can say that I have also been driven by perfection in the past, but through the years, I have realized that perfection is unattainable and that what really matters is to aim for self-improvement and be satisfied with the quality of our own work.
I work in the NGO sector for organizations who do development work and humanitarian assistance. I’m facing a dilemma lately about whether or not I should go into the consulting business once my current contract comes to an end.
I think I’m attracted to the consulting business for some genuinely good reasons and some other reasons that might be superficial.
On the one hand, I believe consulting firms offer many opportunities to improve the quality of our work, think more logically, be more efficient at what we do, etc. To keep my motivation at work, I need to constantly be challenged and be learning new things.
On the other hand, I’m also attracted to the business because of the prestige and the salary that goes with it. However, I’m not sure money and prestige will be enough to keep me motivated to dedicate 70 hours a week of my time to a job.
I still have a few more months to think about my next move before my contract comes to an end. The more I think about it, the less I believe I should try and become a consultant in a big firm.
However, I would be interested in learning how to think and work like a consultant as a mean of reaching excellence in my line of work.
Do you have any resources/books to recommend me ?
That would be greatly appreciated.
Samuel
Samuel,
If you wonder if the money and prestige will be enough to keep you motivated, I will say that in my experience it will not — or at least not for very long.
Anytime someone “wonders” it usually means in their heart they already know the answer, but their brain is trying to disagree with it. In a conflict between one’s heart and one’s brain, the heart will win in the end… or cause one so much against while it is being ignored.
This isn’t true 100% of the time, but probably true 80% of the time.
In terms of resources, if you want to master the analytical thinking process of consulting, I would recommend getting LOMS https://www.caseinterview.com/loms
To learn more about the client management skills, join my newsletter for new consultants at https://www.caseinterview.com/new-consultant
Other books you might look at, but they are either a bit technical or only take key topics superficially are Barbara Minto’s Pyramid Principle (which I demonstrate and teach extensively in LOMS) and The McKinsey Way.
-Victor
Hello Victor,
Thank you for the prompt answer. I couldn’t agree more with your comments.
I have read the McKinsey Way and Engagement. I thought the concepts in the first one were interesting, but they are only addressed superficially.
I’ll have a look at Barbara Minto’s material, maybe it will give me some good insights. As for the LOMS, I have been thinking about getting a copy, but it’s a big investment for someone in the NGO sector who’s not aiming at becoming a consultant in a top firm.
Thanks for the information! Have a wonderful Holiday Season!
Samuel
Victor, your emails and articles always come at the right time in my life and help me find clarity when I most need it.
Last time it was when I just got my PhD and was on the crossroads between continuing to pursue Management Consulting opportunities or to go with a startup. That’s when you emailed us about being aware of our own strengths.
And now, just as I’ve been really torturing myself about coming up with a million-dollar idea for my own company/app/website, this article pops up at the height of my frustrations.
By all means I should be absolutely happy and satisfied. I am working from home, in the best city in the world, with the free time to do all the things that I’ve been wanting to do, and starting a life together with a wonderful husband and nicest dog ever. Yet, my Ivy League education and my Big Ten PhD at a top institution makes me feel like I’m not fully applying myself. That mental splinter of our drive for perfection gets really annoying at times.
Instead of seeking perfection and comparing ourselves to colleagues and strangers who traveled down their own paths, it really is important to realize that in the end, the reason for having money and success is to obtain happiness. Since in our short life, happiness is a subjective thing achieved by personal satisfaction, what’s the point in beating ourselves up chasing after a goal that’s only going to bring more frustrations down the line.
Thanks again Victor!
SZ
Samantha,
I find its hard to be creative when one is being self critical and harsh with oneself. Just relax into it.
Also from a process standpoint, one of the things I teach my clients is to forget about coming up with the killer product idea, website or app. Instead, go spend time with an audience you might want to serve, get to know them really well and try to figure out what problem they have that irritates them.
That’s right, go hang out with some complainers… and THEN figure out how to solve the problem.
This is demand-driven product development, as opposed to the more common (but far riskier) supply driven product development process.
Every article, video, service and product on this website exists not because I thought it was a good idea. Every item exists because someone like you asked for it (and generally several people).
-Victor
Wow, great post and awesome honesty! As we well know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I honestly say your words were really beautiful. As you indicated life is not about perfection (becoming CEO) but rather about seeking excellence. Giving to others is such an wonderful concept for in it you help others achieve their best selves. As a consultant for the past 7.5 years, I love seeing a client achieve success in an engagement due to my coaching and support. Helping other to become their best is what consulting is all about. I so appreciate your candor and honesty. It’s fresh and encouraging. As a reader of your blog for the past 1.5 years, I’ve enjoyed the concepts you present and the way you’ve shared about yourself to help others. I’ve watched your videos and read some of the books you’ve suggested (I’m currently reading Words that work). I’m sure there are numerous people you’ve helped that you know nothing about. They read your blog, and newsletter and then just go forth and conquer. Thanks for being real and sharing from your heart. We are all better for it. As an older consultant (50 ), it’s refreshing to see someone who wants to give back and asks very little in return. Keep up the good work and may you and your family be blessed.
Andre,
Thanks for the warm wishes. Much appreciate and the best to you and your family as well.
-Victor
I work in a health management firm in Nigeria run by a brilliant ex- Mckinsey guy who likes to make you feel sad when you don’t meet his standard, now don’t get me wrong he is a nice guy he just gets nasty if you aren’t hitting the benchmark. Two nights ago he told me that a report I had written was below bar cos I know I’m smart and I just so wanted for him to know that and please him, that I have been feeling blue since then.
Now however reading this article I’m pretty sure I understand my boss better. I’m now free to strive to be better each time at what I do, to enjoy the process , working hard and smart while at it!
Thank you Vic.! What a blessing this article has been to me.
Gracias!
Adeshina,
De Nada!
If its any consolation, people like your boss who make you feel bad for not meeting your expectations, also make themselves feel bad when they don’t meet their own expectations. So in once sense, he probably treats everyone equally.
By the way, the better way to handle such a situation from his situation is to say that the REPORT didn’t meet his expectations (as opposed conveying you as a person are somehow not worthy). This keeps the focus on the output or the behavior as oppose to the person’s intrinsic self.
Also, its much more actionable if he says this report didn’t meet my expectations. There were 3 things missing:
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3
Instead of doing Item 1 this way, it would have been better if you did it this other way — it’s simpler
For item 2 instead X, it would have been better to do it Y way — its more precise that way.
And finally for item 3 instead of A, doing in like B would have been better — it gets the main idea across sooner. Yes you had the right idea, but it took me too long to realize you had the right idea.
Good effort, next time work on these 3 things and see if you can make it better.
Giving feedback in this way, which is really more coaching than “attacking” allows the other person (in this case) you to not feel bad about oneself, keeps motivation high, and gets better results over time.
He may have done this (and you didn’t mention it), but I thought I’d clarify for the sake of others who might be reading this.
-Victor
Hey Victor,
You are very brave man. I respect you a lot.
BR
Bogdan,
You’re very kind. Thank you.
-Victor
I love you. Maybe I’ll post a better reply some other time but this article really, really hit home for me. Thank you.